DEARBORN
DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARIES
LIBRARY
COMMISSION MEETING
1. ATTENDANCE
In attendance
were: MR. MARCEL PULTORAK, Chairperson; Dr. Alex Shami, Vice-Chair, MRS.
CANDYCE ABBATT and MR. ROBERT TAUB, Commissioners.
MRS. MARYANNE
BARTLES, Library Director; MRS. JULIE SCHAEFER, Deputy Library Director; MS.
TARA GNAU, MR. STEVE SMITH, Administrative Librarians.
EXCUSED: MRS. NANCY ZAKAR, Secretary-Treasurer and MR.
DAVID SCHLAFF, Commissioner.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of
the September Library Commission meeting were approved as submitted.
3. FOUNDATION UPDATE
Mrs. Bartles
reported that at the last Library Foundation meeting the costs for the
children’s upgrade project were presented. Chris DeBear of Library Design
priced each element of the design separately. The Library Foundation asked
Library Administration to consult with Chris DeBear regarding the pricing
structure and if there were any opportunities to reduce some of the costs. They do not wish to reduce the quality of the
materials used. Mrs. Bartles state that
Chris DeBear is very familiar with libraries and how they function. Also important is his relationship with the
fabricators who do a lot of custom work for libraries. Mrs. Bartles suggested that the Foundation
might want to consider completing one piece of the children’s upgrade and then
use the story boards to showing additional upgrades as a fund raising
tool. The Foundation is currently hoping
to do a much bigger portion of the project and then encourage donations for the
branches. Mrs. Abbatt asked if they were
getting any donations yet. Mrs. Bartles
stated they have not. They do not have
their web site up yet. They have
contracted with a web site designer but they have not given him the information
about what is wanted on the web page. Mrs. Bartles stated that if we have time
we may put up a link on our web page about helping the library and then give
information on donating to the library directly, donating to the Library
Foundation and/or to the Friends of the Library. Mrs. Abbatt asked if they were
planning to send out a letter for annual giving as the end of the year is
coming. Mrs. Bartles stated that she
mentioned at the last Foundation meeting that this is the time of year that
people are looking to donate and we do not want to miss out on that. The next Library Foundation meeting is
Tuesday, Oct. 23rd at
4. BUDGET UPDATE
Mrs. Bartles
reported that they have not received any information as of yet on the
preparations for next year’s budget. Mr.
Pultorak asked if there were any changes to this year’s budget and Mrs. Bartles
explained that the biggest change is that library aid monies now go to the
general fund rather than to the library.
In the past this money went into its own separate fund that the library
could carry year to year if it was not used.
This allowed us to save the funds for a big project. We used these funds to purchase Dynix,
Envisonware and the upgrade to Horizon.
We may not be able to do that any longer.
5. INFORMATION ITEMS
1. Word Processing-Branches-Steve Smith
reported that word processing will be added at the Bryant Branch on Tuesday or
Wednesday of next week. Word processing
will be added at Esper next which seems to have the highest demand for word
processing of all the branch location.
We will add word processing at Snow Branch after Esper. Word processing should be launched at all the
branch locations by the next Library Commission meeting.
2. New Commissioners-Mrs. Bartles
reported that she got an email earlier in the week from the Mayor’s secretary
relaying a question from Mark Guido about the four candidates submitted for the
vacancies on the Library Commission.
Mrs. Bartles has not heard anything further since then.
3. Henry Ford Statue update-Rededication ceremony Tuesday,
4. Library Systems Manager-Mrs. Bartles
explained that Steve Smith’s old position was a Librarian II position. The
position is more of an IT position than a librarian position. We had to go through the Civil Service
Commission and the City Council to have the position reclassified which took a
long time. The position no longer
requires a Master’s Degree in Library Science.
We promoted
5. Red Tag DVD cases-Mrs.
Schaefer explained that starting about two weeks ago our new DVD’s are being
shipped in cases that have a red security tag inserted into the case. Both of
our major distributors are sending our new orders with the tags. The tag prevents the case from being
opened. Patrons have to bring the case
to the circulation desk to have the tag removed. Mrs. Schaefer demonstrated the new tags.
6. Commission Agenda-Mr. Pultorak
explained the change in the Library Commission format. Instead of old and new business the items on
the agenda will be listed as information items and action items and a separate
section for new business. Items
requiring a vote will be listed as an action item.
7. New Business-Mrs. Bartles advised the
Library Commission that we received a complaint through the Mayor’s office that
we do not charge enough for Internet use.
Mrs. Bartles is preparing a reply and she will tell the complainant that
she will bring his suggestion to the Library Commission. Mr. Pultorak asked if
the Library Commission could see information on what portion of Internet users
at the libraries are residents vs. non-residents. Mrs. Bartles stated she would prepare a
packet for the next meeting.
Dr. Shami
stated that he thought the HFCL building looks very nice and he would like to commend those responsible
for the flowers and the building up keep.
Mrs. Bartles explained that the Garden Club of Dearborn supports the library by planting the flowers all
around the building. Mrs. Abbatt also said that Bryant Branch looks wonderful as
well. Mrs. Bartles stated that the
Department of Public Works handles Bryant. Mr. Pultorak stated we should send a letter to the Dearborn Garden
Club and DPW to thank them for their support.
Mrs. Bartles advised the Library
Commissioners that there is a link to the City Charter changes on the City of
6. ACTION ITEMS
1.
Five Year Technology Plan-The five year technology plan was
distributed to the Library Commission. Mrs. Bartles explained that it was due
to the CDI Technology Committee after the last Commission meeting so she was
not able to present it to the Commission before turning it in. It is an estimate of technology needs so that
the City can better plan for upcoming initiatives. There were questions and
discussions related to some of the possible projects such as wireless Internet
access and RFI tags. The Library Commission received and filed the 5 year
Technology Plan.
The
meeting was adjourned at