DEARBORN DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARIES

LIBRARY COMMISSION MEETING

Nov. 4, 2005

 

1. ATTENDANCE:

In attendance were: MRS. NANCY ZAKAR, Chairperson, MR. MARCEL PULTORAK, Vice-Chairperson; MR. ROBERT TAUB, MR. RONALD WATTERS, Commissioners;

DR. PATRICK COADY, Library Director, MARYANNE BARTLES, Assistant Library Director, MS. TARA GNAU, MRS. JULIE SCHAEFER, Administrative Librarians.

Excused: MRS. SYLVIA PRESSMAN, MRS. CANDYCE ABBATT,

MRS. DIANE PEPPER, MR. DAVID SCHLAFF, Commissioners.

Absent:  DR. ALEX SHAMI, Secretary-Treasurer.

 

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

There was not a quorum of Library Commissioners present at the meeting so the minutes could not be approved. 

 

3. DEPARTMENTAL RULES VOTE:

As we do not have a quorum of Library Commissioners present at this meeting we will have to postpone voting on the revisions to the next Commission meeting. 

 

4. FOUNDATION UPDATE:

The next meeting of the library foundation board will be Nov. 21, 2005 at 7pm.  Two additional board members have been added.  They are both attorney’s.  Foundation board member Steve Roberts volunteered to write the draft foundation by laws if Dr. Coady would provide him with some examples of bylaws from other foundations which Dr. Coady and Tara Gnau were able to provide for him.  The bylaws should be part of the next foundation meeting on Nov. 21, 2005 as they are critical for the foundation to move forward.  Dr. Coady will meet with Ann Knoop, Foundation Chairperson, on Nov. 7 to discuss the next meeting.  Mr. Pultorak stated that we should have a Commissioner who will work as a liaison to the foundation.  Mrs. Zakar stated that they will come to the Commission as a resource when they determine what project or projects they want to work on.  Mrs. Zakar stated that for now Dr. Coady is the contact that the foundation will go through.  Dr. Coady complimented Nancy Zakar and Candyce Abbatt’s presentations at the first foundation meeting. They set a very nice tone at the start of the initial foundation meeting.   

 

5. ENVISIONWARE UPDATE:

Mrs. Bartles reported that Envisonware, which is the software that controls our public Internet usage and our public network printing, is going well.  The software gives our patrons a much more equitable access to the Internet.  The software requires a 10 minute minimum session time which has an impact at the end of the evening when we are close to closing time but most patrons have understood.  Staff is pleased with the software.  We have had a slight decline in Internet usage since the software was implemented which may be due to patrons having to give their names to use the Internet.  Day passes which are anonymous users who have paid $1 a day have been more popular than we anticipated.  In the month of October we sold a little over 1000 dollars in day passes and Internet user cards.  Mrs. Zakar asked if the library currently has wireless Internet access available.  The City is contemplating changing the branch access to HFCL’s network to a wireless system rather than a T1 line so that our connection to the branches would be wireless.  As far as wireless Internet access for the public from our buildings we do not have the funding to pursue at this time and we are not sure if it would function correctly at HFCL due to the nature of the building construction. Our first concern is the upcoming switch over to Horizon.  Mr. Pultorak stated that chasing technological change is another cost pressure that the Commission has to deal with. 

 

7. NEW BUSINESS:

Mrs. Zakar asked if any issues had developed over the changes the Commission made to the number of times material can be renewed and to adding a limit to the number of items a patron can have out at one time.  Mrs. Bartles replied that the 100 item limit on items checkout has not but the maximum of two renewals on an item before it must be returned has.  We have received comments on this policy on the green suggestion slips that the public may fill out at any library location. The number of holds does seem to be increasing but this has also been a growth area so we are not sure if this is related to the renewal restriction or not.  Dr. Coady stated that before the change was made Administration surveyed several libraries on their renewal limits and the average was two or three renewals.  We put a lot of consideration into the change and to making more material available for browsing.

 

Mr. Pultorak stated that he and Mrs. Zakar should send an email to those Commissioners not in attendance today stating that their presence was missed and to ask them to make a special effort to make the next meeting. 

 

Dr. Coady stated that the Commission felt that the Friends of the Dearborn Library should have a Commissioner attend their next meeting to explain the Foundation role.  Mr. Pultorak will attend the next Friends meeting to do that. 

 

Mrs. Bartles stated that one of our Librarian I’s has resigned so we currently have a vacancy.  The position will be open to promotion as we have two Assistant Librarians with MLS degrees. 

 

Mr. Taub stated that with the upcoming City charter revisions on the table it might be useful for the library to look at the charter to see how changes might affect the library. 

 

There was discussion relating to the new Google print service and what implications it might have regarding library service. 

 

Library patron Glenn Okray spoke to the Library Commission.  He stated that an issue came up the other day in regards to distributing literature in front of the library.  Mr. Okray does not agree with the City’s position on this matter and is asking Dr. Coady to direct his staff not to call the police if someone is distributing material in front of a library building until clarification has been made.   Mr. Watters asked what type of literature we were talking about and Mr. Okray stated it is election material for City Commission.  Mr. Okray states that the City charter says that employees may not distribute election materials but it does not state that the general public may not.  Dr. Coady stated that he has been told that only Corporation Counsel may interpret the law for the City.  This issue first arose last Monday and Dr. Coady spoke to Corporation Counsel about it and was told that if a person is on City property handing out election material they must leave or the police are to be called. Unless Corporation Counsel changes that guidance Dr. Coady feels compelled to follow what he was told. Mr. Okray stated he sent an email to Dr. Coady and to the Legal Department regarding this.  Mr. Pultorak stated that Mr. Okray should speak to the Legal Department.  Dr. Coady stated that the Legal Department should contact us if there is a change.  Mr. Pultorak stated there poll limits set for election activities and typically you do not see electioneering taking place in shopping malls and the like though you do certainly see electioneering going on in the park during Dearborn Homecoming.  He has no idea what law or rule applies in this case.  Mr. Okray stated he had a copy of the City Charter.  Mr. Pultorak stated that the rule may not be in the charter document.  It could be an ordinance or other rule.  Mr. Okray read a passage from the City Charter that he said Corporation Counsel had quoted him as the rule he was in violation of.  Mr. Okray stated he was a reasonable person who had better things to do with his Saturday than sit in jail or pay off tickets.  Mr. Okray stated that a reasonable compromise would be to allow literature to be passed out at the flag pole.  He has no desire to see the library in the newspaper on Sunday morning.  Dr. Coady stated he shared that sentiment but it is not his decision to make.  Mr. Watters stated the flag pole still City property.  Dr. Coady stated that he would try to reach Corporation Counsel to double check and see if their guidance had changed.  Mr. Okray stated that he left Debbie Walling a voice mail message this morning regarding this.  He first tried to reach her on Wednesday morning but she did not get back to him till 5pm on Thursday.  She advised him at that time that the City Charter prohibits this however after he hung up with her he read the City Charter and does not agree with her interpretation.  Mr. Pultorak stated we have no way of knowing what information Ms. Walling was referring to in her statement.  Mr. Pultroak asked if this was relating to passing out information at the Bryant Branch Library.  Mr. Okray stated it was not. It was regarding Henry Ford Centennial Library only.  Mr. Okray stated his group surveyed candidates for City Charter Commission in regard to their feelings on the library system.  They want to pass out documentation endorsing the twelve candidates they feel would be best for the library.  Mr. Pultorak stated that he understands then why they are trying to reach library patrons.  Mr. Okray stated he is a volunteer at the Bryant Library and if he is arrested it will not look good.  Dr. Coady stated he agrees.  Mr. Pultorak stated that this is a contentious issue all the way around particularly because of the First Amendment implications.  Dr. Coady stated he will try to reach Corporation Counsel.  If he is able to do so and there is a change in position he will call Mr. Okray to advise him of that provided he can give a phone number where he can be reached. Mr. Okray agreed to do so. 

 

 

The meeting was adjourned at 5:05PM.