DEARBORN DEPARTMENT OF
LIBRARIES
LIBRARY COMMISSION MEETING
MARCH 12, 2004
1.
ATTENDANCE:
The meeting was called to order at 4:05PM. In attendance were:
MRS. CANDYCE ABBATT, Chairperson; MRS. NANCY ZAKAR,
Vice-Chairperson;
MS. SYLVIA PRESSMAN, MR. ROBERT TAUB, MRS. LILA AMEN,
MR. RONALD WATTERS, MR. MARCEL PULTORAK,
Commissioners;
MRS. MARYANNE BARTLES, Assistant City Librarian; MS.
CAROLYN HOOK,
MS. TARA GNAU, Administrative Librarians; MRS.CARLA
EGGERT, Recording Secretary; MS. OPAL ZIEMER, AAUW. Excused: DR. PATRICK COADY,
City Librarian; Absent: DR. ALEX SHAMI, Secretary-Treasurer; MR. DAVE
SCHLAFF, Commissioner.
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the February 13, 2004 Library
Commission meeting were approved as submitted.
3.
VOLUNTEER STUDY UPDATE:
MS. GNAU reported that the volunteer survey has been
completed and a draft document has been prepared. The administrative panel is reviewing the
document. Once the review is complete a
report on the survey will be presented to the Library Commission. MS. GNAU also
advised the Commission that the Volunteer Luncheon would be held this year on
May 12 between 12 and 2pm. She will
advise them of the location once it had been determined.
4.
FOUNDATION UPDATE:
MRS. ABBATT advised this item would be deferred to
the next Commission meeting. The four
potential chairpersons for the foundation have not yet been approached about
it. The plan is to talk with them by the
end of this month.
5. GLEN
MICHAELS UPDATE:
MRS. BARTLES reported that the target date that Mr.
Michaels has given for completion of the rotunda pool project is February
2005. He has been working on the project
at regular intervals and is currently working on firing the glass for the pool
bottom. There has been some concern
about the pool not being refilled between Mr. Michaels visits to work on
it. MRS. BARTLES explained that Mr.
Michaels needs the pool to be completely dry when he works on it so we have
decided not to refill it each time. We
have put a sign in the rotunda to advise patrons of the work being done.
6. BRYANT
BROCHURE REVIEW:
A new version of the Bryant brochure was presented to
the Commission. At the last meeting the
Commission had proposed several changes to the brochure regarding Bryant. Since that meeting the Mayor has also given
his suggestions on the brochure and the designation as a “popular materials
center” so further revisions were made to the brochure. MRS. ABBATT stated that in talking with the
staff at Bryant she knows that they are anxious to receive the brochure. MR. WATTERS asked how the brochure would be
distributed? MRS. HOOK stated they will
be available at each library location and they will be available to use at
community meetings where budget cuts and library reductions are being
discussed. MR. WATTERS asked if we would
post it on the web page? MRS. HOOK
stated we would post it to the web page as well. MRS. ABBATT stated we also might want to make
it available at City Hall in the Mayors Office, City Clerk and
Treasurer’s. MR. TAUB motioned to
approve the brochure, seconded by
MR. PULTORAK, all approved. MRS. ABBATT also complimented the sign
recently put up at Bryant Branch that states, “There are no plans to close
Bryant Branch” and is signed by DR. COADY.
7. BUDGET
AND STAFF REDUCTION UPDATE:
MRS. BARTLES stated that the City budget review
process is underway. They are
tentatively scheduling the end of March for City Administration to turn in the entire
budget package to City Council. The City Council will begin their discussions
with the individual departments somewhere around the end of April.
8. CIP
PROJECT UPDATE:
The Commissioner’s were given a list of capital
improvement projects that have been submitted.
MR. PULTROAK asked how the estimated costs of the various projects were
determined? Were they taken from the
deficiency study done a few years ago and if so have they been indexed for
inflation? MS. BARTLES stated that for
some of the projects the cost came from the deficiency study and some are cost
estimates. MR. PULTORAK stated that
there is the possibility some of the amounts might be under funded. MRS. BARTLES stated that the City is
concerned about maintaining it’s building and has set aside an amount of
funding for capital improvements for building deficiencies. MRS. BARTLES stated that the HFCL
Copier/Print management project on the list has been changed. The copier and
network printing services that we offer to the public cost the library quite a
bit of money even though we lease the machines.
The volume of copying and printing done by patrons does not cover the
cost of the new digital copiers. In discussions with the Finance Department they
prefer that we continue to provide copier service on a lease basis. At this point we only plan to purchase better
software to manage the Internet printing service. For the relamping project there is discussion
currently about having a maintenance agreement with a company to come in and maintain
the lights at all four buildings. Some
of the projects are for future years and will not be funded now.
9. NEW
BUSINESS:
The Commissioner’s were reminded that the April
Commission meeting would be held on Friday, April 2, 2004 due to the Good Friday
holiday.
MR. PULTORAK stated he would miss the May and
possibly the June Commission meeting due to an extended vacation.
Library patron Marge Breyer spoke to the Library
Commission. She said that many Dearborn
residents hold the library staff in high esteem. However, it came as a shock to
her to receive the library newsletter in the mail because the article on the
Bryant Branch states that the Commission was able to come up with a reduction
plan that does involve closing the Bryant Branch at least through the 2004
budget year. She feels this makes people
think it will close in 2005. Also, the article states that as of July 1 the
Bryant Branch will become a popular materials center open 20 hours per week. This makes it sound as if a decision has been
made already and she was under the impression that budget meetings with the
City Council have not been conducted yet.
MRS. ABBATT explained that the there are no plans to close the branch in
2005 but the budget is planned only through the 2004 fiscal year so they do not
know what reductions the 2005 fiscal year will bring at this time. As far as decisions that have been made the
Library Commission has voted and approved the Bryant changes and hour
reductions in response to request by City Administration to meet budget
reductions. MR. PULTORAK explained that
City Administration must present a proposed budget to the City Council by April
15. Departments must submit their budgets to City Administration working with the
information that they are given at the time. With the continuing state funding
cuts the probability of further reductions in coming years is high unless
changes are made on a state level. Ms. Breyer states she has attended meetings
where the Mayor spoke and asked for input from citizens on creative ways to
make cuts in the various city departments.
She feels it was premature of the Library Commission to put in writing
that this is what is going to happen when it has not been decided. MR. PULTORAK asked if it would have been
better to wait until July to notify the public?
Ms. Breyer stated it should not have been announced until it is definite
as there may be other creative reductions found or the City may have a win fall
so these changes may not go into effect.
MR. PULTORAK explained that the scenario outlined in the newsletter is
the most likely outcome due to the budget constraints the City is facing. MRS. ABBATT stated she could appreciate Ms.
Breyer’s opinion but the Commission felt it was best to notify the public as
early as possible. Ms. Breyer also feels
that the reference service that will be provided at Bryant after the reductions
will not be sufficient. She wonders if
the business section will be kept current, if newspapers will be available and
if materials such as Value Line will be available? MRS. HOOK stated that business periodicals
and newspapers would be continue to be available.
Mary Weiss, who lives on Garrison behind the Bryant
Branch and is a recently retired Media Specialist with the Dearborn Schools,
spoke to the Library Commission. She
first heard that Bryant Branch would become a popular materials center with a
coffee bar, which was scary to her. She
was very concerned that there would not be children’s materials available. The main value of the library is for children
particularly in the summer months when the schools libraries are closed. Children cannot always get to a library
location other than the one in their neighborhood. She was very glad to see that material for
children will still be available at Bryant Branch. She feels that programming for children must
also be maintained especially in the summer months. Programs must also be announced so parents
know when they are. Branch hours have
changed several times so it’s difficult for people to know when the library is
open. If people are not aware of your programs and when the building is open
attendance will low. MR. PULTORAK
discussed one of the problems in funding programs in Michigan. The Headly
Amendment allocates a specific percentage of the states budget to “local
government” which protected local government as a class but did not protect
cities vs. schools vs. counties vs. villages, etc. This means that a much higher percentage of
the states budget is going to local school districts today which is part of the
reasons cities are being cut. The
problem is public libraries receive very minimal support from the State of
Michigan. With the current job
creation problem people have a greater need to continuously upgrade
skills. We need to rethink the funding
of education for children and for adults and what the public libraries role in
that is. Ms. Weiss stated that studies
show that library use is going down and one of the ways to combat that is to
make sure people feel comfortable in the library and see it as a community
resource.
If children come to the library at a young age they
feel comfortable and will continue to use the library throughout their
life.
Mr. Glen Okray spoke to the Library Commission. He stated he would like to reemphasize the
items that have already been mentioned.
He feels like the Bryant brochure fly’s in the face of what the Mayor
said about the need for input from the community. At the community meeting held at the Lutheran
Church everyone stressed his or her desire to keep or extend the hours of the
Bryant Branch. Another thing that came
through at the meeting was the need for volunteers. He would have preferred that the brochure
said that we decided to extend the hours at Bryant to 40 hours a week and then
lets work it out. He is a believer that
after public safety the next obligation of the City of Dearborn should come to
the intellectual enhancement of its citizens and the way to do that is through
the library. He feels that it is
important the hours be maintained and that the citizens have the belief that
the Mayor and the Library Commission are listening to them. We have tons of volunteers and the way to
increase the hours is to use volunteers.
MRS. ABBATT stated that a study of volunteers is currently being
done. MR. PULTORAK stated that if we got
a program in place that was working than we may increase the hours but without
having a solid program in place we cannot commit to it. MRS. BARTLES stated that library staff is
going to be decreased by five full time employees. That loss of five employees has to be taken
from somewhere. Due to Bryant’s proximity to Henry Ford Centennial and because
Bryant has the lowest traffic of all the library locations Bryant was the
logical location for hours reductions. When the building is open two staff members
need to there. It is dangerous for one
staff member to be alone in the building.
If you schedule one full time employee and you are counting on a
volunteer to be the second person and they do not show up it will cause a great
deal of problems.
MRS. ABBATT thanked all the speakers for their time
and for their suggestions.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:45PM.
Dr. Alex Shami
Secretary-Treasurer